
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.


Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies) Paperback – 25 Oct. 2007
Bruno Latour (Author) See search results for this author |
-
Prime Student members get 10% off.
Prime Student members get an extra 10% off a selection of books. Offered by Amazon.co.uk. Here's how (terms and conditions apply)
- Choose from over 20,000 locations across the UK
- FREE unlimited deliveries at no additional cost for all customers
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Enhance your purchase
Rather than simply indicating what is already assembled together, it is now used in a way that makes assumptions about the nature of what is assembled. It has become a word that designates two distinct things: a process of assembling: and a type of material, distinct from others. Latour shows why "the social" cannot be thought of as a kind of material or domain, and disputes attempts to provide a "social explanation" of other states of affairs. While these attempts have been productive (and probably necessary) in the past, the very success of the social sciences mean that they are largely no longer so. At the present stage it is no longer possible to inspect the precise constituents entering the social domain. Latour returns to the original meaning of "the social" to redefine the notion and allow it to trace connections again. It will then be possible to resume the traditional goal of the social sciences, but using more refined tools. Drawing on his extensive work examining the "assemblages" of nature, Latour finds it necessary to scrutinize thoroughly the exact content of what is assembled under the umbrella of Society.
- ISBN-100199256055
- ISBN-13978-0199256051
- EditionNew Ed
- PublisherOxford University Press, USA
- Publication date25 Oct. 2007
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions23.11 x 15.49 x 1.78 cm
- Print length301 pages
Frequently bought together
- +
- +
Customers who bought this item also bought
Special offers and product promotions
- Prime Student members get an extra 10% off a selection of books. Offered by Amazon.co.uk. Here's how (terms and conditions apply)
Product description
Review
Book Description
About the Author
Bruno Latour is a Professor at the Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris. Having been trained as a philosopher, then an anthropologist, Bruno Latour specialized in the analysis of scientists and engineers at work, and published works on philosophy, history, sociology, and the anthropology of science. He is the author of Laboratory Life (Princeton University Press), We Have Never Been Modern (Harvard University Press), and Pandora's Hope: Essays in the Reality of Science Studies (Harvard University Press).
I’d like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press, USA; New Ed edition (25 Oct. 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 301 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0199256055
- ISBN-13 : 978-0199256051
- Dimensions : 23.11 x 15.49 x 1.78 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 37,740 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
"Reassembling the Social" is a companion piece to Latour's "The Politics of Nature", also published in 2005, and is perhaps easier to understand in that prior context. But even coming to these books in that order, I swung between enrapture and teeth-gnashing ire at the circuitous way that the ANT concepts are deployed here. From Latour's perspective, this is the necessary way to frame his argument to avoid misunderstandings: I do not think most readers will agree, although this hardly means Latour is in error. The problem is that ANT is not a sociological method so much as it is a negative thesis about where social sciences fail because of a confusion between politics and science, and between facts and truth - both points being far more clearly developed in "The Politics of Nature".
While I ultimately loved this book, completing it did not eliminate my frustrations with its awkward structure. Promised that its winding journey would lead to practical standards by which to judge Latour's view of 'the social' and of 'science', in the end I fully comprehended the first but was left wanting on the second. As a philosopher whose interest was not sociological, I can live with this - but a trained sociologist is likely to be running out of hair by the time they reach the conclusion! Part of the problem is that Latour is indebted to (and reliant upon) philosophy that he never discusses or explains - he channels Deleuze in almost every thought, and constantly presents Kant as his silent opponent. Nonetheless, like Kierkegaard attacking Hegel, "Latour doth protest too much" - if you have no idea why Kant is still important, you cannot possibly appreciate Latour's position against him. This is why "We Have Never Been Modern", with its explicit assault on Kant's critiques, is a far better place to start.
So in summary:
- If you've never read any Latour, start with "We Have Never Been Modern".
- If you know Latour but don't know his position on the relationship between the sciences and politics, go to "The Politics of Nature" first.
- If you're a sociologist, read this as a polemic intended to make you critically question your concepts, or as a means of understanding the motives behind ANT and science studies.
- If you're a philosopher, read this only if ANT is specifically useful to your work in some way.
- If you're familiar with (yet confused by) ANT, this may help set out the purpose and methods of the approach.
Best of luck with your travels with Latour! He is one of the most invigorating - and irritating - thinkers at work today.
Given that the central problem Latour hopes to address is; `Is a science of the social possible again provided we modify what is meant by social and science?' it serves as a useful clarification of Latour's `project'. Although those familiar with his corpus will know on what side of this question he is likely to come down, it is fascinating to see how he justifies his work in relation to the history and substantive problems of social science.
The substantive content of the book is divided into two sections, the first dealing with five `uncertainties' (or theoretical problems) which Actor Network Theory reacts to and the second explores some of the moves that ANT takes in order to ameliorate the problems it has identified in non-ANT social science. Although it strikes most clearly in the sociological register, this book should also be of interest to those interested other fields, such as philosophy, literary theory and political science.
If I have one qualm with this book, it's that I'm not sure how well it serves as an introduction to ANT. Although the introductory chapter is excellent in positioning Latour's version of ANT against its competitors and reading ANT in relation to the history of social theory, the work is perhaps better described as a `theoretical clarification of ANT'. In these situations, I am minded to ask how my appreciation of ANT would differ if this had been my first port of call. After some consideration, I think that if I had the chance to start reading this literature again, I don't think that I would begin with this book. Given that ANT is at its most powerful when doing actual explanatory work, `We Have Never Been Modern' (my own starting point) might be a better bet.
However, this is only a minor quibble. The book is very good at what it does; acting as a theoretical summary/manifesto for ANT. Serving as a synopsis of the theoretical concerns which undergird ANT, it should be essential reading for anyone seeking to apply ANT in an academic context. Indeed, if pushed to make a judgment, I would say that this was Latour's own aim in writing this text. If assessed with reference to Latour's own aim that `this book [should be] an introduction to help the interested reader in drawing the social theory consequences of the sociology of science', then this book is a resounding success.